How DAOs work?

1. Smart Contracts: DAOs operate through smart contracts on a blockchain, automating processes and ensuring predefined rules are followed without human intervention.

2. Governance Tokens: Members hold governance tokens, which grant them voting rights on proposals and decisions. The more tokens one has, the greater their influence.

3. Proposals and Voting: Members submit proposals for changes or actions. Token holders vote on proposals. If a proposal gains enough votes, smart contracts execute the action automatically.

4. Treasury Management: DAOs manage a treasury funded by members or external contributors. Funds are allocated based on collective decisions made through the voting process.

Detailed Process

Smart Contracts

Smart contracts are the backbone of a DAO. They are self-executing contracts with the terms directly written into code, running on a blockchain. These contracts automatically enforce rules and execute agreed-upon actions without the need for intermediaries. This ensures transparency and reliability, as the code is visible and immutable.

Governance Tokens

Governance tokens are issued to members, representing their stake and voting power within the DAO. These tokens can be earned through contributions, purchased, or distributed as part of an initial setup. Token holders can propose and vote on changes, influencing the DAO’s direction and decisions. The token-based system aligns incentives, as the DAO’s success typically increases the tokens’ value.

Proposals and Voting

Members can submit proposals for changes, funding requests, or new initiatives. The community discusses these proposals, and token holders cast their votes. Voting mechanisms can vary, with some DAOs using simple majority rule while others implement more complex systems like quadratic voting. Once a proposal reaches the required threshold, the smart contract executes the decision, ensuring compliance with the DAO’s rules.

Treasury Management

The DAO’s treasury is crucial, holding the funds for operations, investments, and projects. Funds can come from membership fees, token sales, or external funding. The treasury is managed collectively, with all spending decisions made through proposals and voting. This decentralized financial management ensures that funds are used transparently and in line with the community’s interests.

Examples of DAOs

  • MakerDAO: Manages the DAI stablecoin, allowing users to propose changes to the protocol and manage collateral.
  • Uniswap: A decentralized exchange where governance token holders vote on protocol changes and fee structures.
  • Aave: A decentralized lending platform with community governance over protocol upgrades and parameters.

Conclusion

DAOs represent a paradigm shift in organizational structure, leveraging blockchain technology to create transparent, democratic, and automated entities. While they offer numerous advantages in decentralization and community governance, they also face legal ambiguity, governance complexities, and security risks. Understanding how DAOs work and their potential impact is essential for navigating the evolving landscape of decentralized

What are DAOs?

Introduction

Onchain organizations, primarily known as Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), leverage blockchain technology, specifically smart contracts, to manage governance and financial operations. These entities exhibit many structures and objectives, extending beyond the traditional DAO model to encompass Protocol DAOs, City DAOs, Network States, Smart Companies, and Guilds. The optimal structure for each organization hinges on its specific goals and operational requirements.

Key Categories of Onchain Organizations

  • Autonomous Organizations: These entities operate with minimal human intervention, relying heavily on smart contracts for automation. A gradual shift towards decentralization and automation characterizes them.
  • Products & Services: These operational organizations heavily involve human decision-making. They encompass teams developing software products, conducting research and development, and providing services.
  • Capital Allocation: Focused on distributing capital for various purposes, including profit generation, ecosystem development, or asset collection. This category includes grant-making entities, investment firms, and collectors.
  • Interest Groups & Social Organizations: Often termed Culture or Social DAOs, these groups range from niche interest communities to large-scale social organizations like the Bored Ape Yacht Club.
  • Onchain Societies: These geography-centric organizations possess physical locations or aspire to establish self-governed societies with political recognition.
  • City DAOs and university DAOs are geographically based organizations often linked to events or institutions, potentially managing funds or developing products.

Key Attributes

Onchain organizations can be categorized based on attributes such as:

  • Decentralization: The degree of control distributed among participants.
  • Governance Structure: The decision-making processes and rules governing the organization.
  • Transparency: The level of visibility into organizational operations and data.
  • Permission Levels: Restrictions on participation and contribution.
  • Profit Orientation: Whether the organization aims to generate financial returns.
  • Operational Autonomy: The degree of independence in decision-making and execution.

These characteristics influence the suitable governance model and required operational tools.

Understanding Decentralization

Decentralization is a core concept in on-chain organizations. It refers to distributing power and control among participants rather than concentrating it in a central authority. This can lead to:

  • Increased resilience: Decentralized systems are less vulnerable to single points of failure.
  • Improved security: Distributed control makes it harder for malicious actors to compromise the system.
  • Enhanced fairness: Decisions are made collectively, potentially reducing bias and inequality.
  • Greater transparency: Information is openly accessible to all participants.

However, decentralization also presents challenges, including:

  • Coordination difficulties: Reaching consensus among many participants can be complex.
  • Scalability Issues: Decentralized systems may struggle to handle high transaction volumes.
  • Security risks: The complexity of decentralized systems can introduce new vulnerabilities.

Governance Models

Various governance models are employed in on-chain organizations:

  • Liquid Democracy: Participants delegate their voting power to others, allowing for efficient decision-making.
  • Quadratic Voting: Voting power is weighted based on the square root of the number of tokens held, incentivizing participation.
  • Token-Based Governance: Decisions are made through token holders voting on proposals.
  • DAO-to-DAO Governance: Multiple DAOs collaborate on decision-making.

Pros and Cons of Onchain Organizations

Pros:

  • Transparency: All transactions and decisions are recorded on a public blockchain.
  • Democracy: Participants have a voice in decision-making.
  • Efficiency: Smart contracts automate processes, reducing operational costs.
  • Innovation: Decentralized environments foster experimentation and new ideas.

Cons:

  • Complexity: Understanding and participating in on-chain organizations can be challenging.
  • Security Risks: Vulnerabilities in smart contracts can lead to financial losses.
  • Scalability Issues: Some blockchain platforms may struggle to handle large-scale organizations.
  • Regulatory Uncertainty: The legal status of on-chain organizations is still evolving.

The Future of Onchain Organizations

The future will likely witness a surge in diverse organizational structures as communities experiment with novel governance models and mechanism designs. Emerging models such as RevNets, Smart Companies, and BORGs are anticipated to shape this evolution.

Conclusion

Onchain organizations offer a dynamic landscape of organizational diversity, enabling rapid implementation and testing of innovative coordination methods. This experimental approach is crucial for identifying the most effective structures for various use cases.